Woman Spends Thanksgiving On Billboard
Shelly Barreras says sometimes you have to do whatever it takes, in a peaceful way, to get results, especially when you’re dealing with government.
New Mexico Governor Richardson has apparently reneged on a promise to help the Barreras family recover $15,000 collected by the state as child support from Steve Barreras, for a child that never existed. more…
John Murtari on News10Now. Watch video HERE.
See trailers for “Support? System Down”, the full-length documentary John will be in. Visit Murtari’s Website AKidsRight.org Learn more about Murtari and the Family Law Reform Movement
john murtari, parents rights, civil rights, divorce, child support, child custody, protest
John Murtari maintains his faith, 109 days after giving up solid food to highlight the need for family law reform. This week that faith paid-off. Yesterday Murtari was interviewed by film producer Angelo Lobo for the documentary “Support? System Down,” as well as a local television crew and newspaper reporter. Today his story appeared in the Associated Press.
See trailers for “Support? System Down”
Visit Murtari’s Website AKidsRight.org
Learn more about Murtari and the Family Law Reform Movement
Read the Press Release
More media coverage…
Fasting inmate to be subject of film on reforming family court
A fasting jail inmate to be film’s subject
Fasting inmate to be subject of film on reforming family court
Has the family law system hurt your family? Have you faced injustice or corruption? Leave a comment below.
protest reform civil Custody family father child fathers men murtari parents rights support
In this Contra Costa Times article Separated But Equal McVal Osborne interviewed local teens whose parents chose collaborative divorce and/or shared parenting. Osborne is a junior at Las Lomas High School in Walnut Creek [California] and a member of the Times’ Life in Perspective, a board made up of local high school journalists.
Says Michael Saarela, a junior who rotates weekly among three households, his mother’s, his stepmother’s, and his father’s:
“I feel that kids who go through divorce are more vivacious and vibrant. I’ve been moving from house to house all my life and it’s taught me a lot. It’s taught me how to be patient.”
Sydney Koliha, a junior who transfers weekly from Walnut Creek to Berkeley and back says:
“Nobody could give me a greater gift than the struggle I had when I was growing up. It allowed me to be independent and learn to take care of myself.”
Sounding like a typical teen from an intact family, Max Nied complained:
“It’s kind of a pain. If I want to go out Saturday night I have to get permission from my dad, and then I have to get permission from my mom to get picked up.”
Then went on:
“I would have to say my family situation is good and bad. I get to see both of my parents every week while my stepsister Aimee only gets to see her dad about once every month…”
More about collaborative divorce:
“The biggest difference between collaborative divorce and litigation is that the parents must agree to try to do what is best for the kids,” says attorney Michael Carter, a member of the Collaborative Practice Group of Contra Costa.
Peggy Thompson, also a member of the CPGCC, believes strongly that children should have the right to influence how the divorce is resolved.
“The most important thing is that the children have their own person to talk to,” says Thompson, a family psychologist and co-author of ‘Collaborative Divorce: The Revolutionary New Way to Restructure Your Family, Resolve Legal Issues, and Move on with Your Life.’ “Very often their ideas are not taken into consideration.”
According to Thompson, questions of child custody should not be set in stone. As families change and the children mature, it may become obvious that child visitations should be modified.
“In collaborative practice, we use a whole different vocabulary because we aren’t dealing with court cases; we’re dealing with human beings,” Thompson says. “Think of the word ‘custody’ — we take criminals into custody. I prefer to think of it as a plan for parenting.”
Thompson says that with the right amount of guidance from child specialists, teens can often create their own schedules that support their developmental needs.
“When teenagers are able to make their calendar, they seem to have much better relationships with their parents,” Thompson says. “Kids that have no say in where they go often become depressed because they lose control over their own lives.”
divorce, child custody, shared parenting, collaborative divorce
I just have to share this cartoon video with you!
The founders and members of Real Fathers For Justice are friends of mine. They are loving parents who’ve had their children removed from their lives for no reason, except they got divorced. Worried about the impact of fatherlessness on children, they’re doing everything they can to change laws to prevent this tragedy from continuining.
Even though Real F4J is based in the UK, this tragedy is happening right here in our own backyard too. In fact, it’s happening all over the world.
If you live in North Dakota, vote YES on MEASURE 3!
shared parenting, equal custody, equal parenting, parenting, children, joint custody, parenting plans, collaborative divorce, child custody, family law reform, civil rights, new civil rights movement, fathers, fathers rights, mens rights, parents, mothers, family court,
One has to wonder why North Dakota bureaurats would be so desperate as to break the law to defeat a bill that would benefit their state’s children. What would cause normal, everyday people to lie, use taxpayer money and their positions to rally illegally against a bill that would bring stability to children after divorce? The answer is obvious, but I’ll get to that later.
First, I’d like to dispell the rumors and lies that have been spread through an efficiently organized campaign of opposition.
It’s been said that North Dakota would lose more than $70 million dollars in federal monies if measure 3 passes. Dr. Wade F. Horn, Assistant Secretary for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services has dispelled this lie in a letter to Ms. Carol K. Olson, Executive Director of North Dakota’s Department of Human Services dated September 27, 2006. (link)
It’s also been said that this measure would harm children financially, that there would no longer be child support. Aside from the fact that all parents support their children financially when they’re in their care (meals, housing, etc) whether custodial or noncustodial, the truth is child support would still exist.
Like California and other states, North Dakota would simply calculate child support based on both parents’ income instead of just one. No longer do we live in a 1950’s society with most moms staying home while dad works. Today, most mothers work outside the home and have their own income. And we can’t ignore the fact that studies show shared parenting increases compliance to child support orders.
One common myth is that shared parenting is unsettling to children, that they won’t know where they’ll be sleeping night-to-night. Ask any child with shared parenting if this is true and they’ll tell you, “No.� Children with shared parenting adjust to their lifestyle just as well as children who are new to overnight day care, camp, visiting grandparents or any number of situations where they sleep away from Mom’s house. The most important thing for a child’s stability is consistency. Keeping both parents actively involved in a child’s life after divorce benefits them.
Children with shared parenting talk about having two neighborhoods, two sets of friends and family, not two houses, but two homes. The number one complain of children of divorce is losing contact with one parent. Shared parenting assures that won’t happen. While opponents claim forcing couples into shared parenting increases conflict, studies show just the opposite; shared parenting reduces conflict. (Bender, W.N. 1994. Joint custody: The option of choice. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 21 (3/4): 115-131)
Opponents want voters to think that measure 3 will force every family into a strict 50/50 timeshare. The truth is every family will work out the timeshare that best benefits their children. Factors such as the age of the children, school, extracurricular activities, location of parents’ homes, etc, will all be taken into account. Parents will write a parenting plan together, one that can and should be adjusted as the years go by and circumstances change.
Domestic violence organizations claim that shared parenting puts women and children in danger. The truth is less than 1% of all divorces are families involved in domestic violence. Considering the fact that all shared parenting bills include provisions to protect these families, why are we punishing the children in the other 99% of divorces?
Domestic violence organizations also allude to the fact children will be forced to spend the night with fathers who sexually abuse them. Aside from the fact that mothers commit most child maltreatment (link), studies show fathers are the least likely to commit sexual abuse (link). The most common adult perpetrator is a male acquaintance of the child’s mother. Keeping fathers close to their children protects them.
There are a multitude of studies showing the positive aspects of shared parenting on children and families. (link)
So, with all of these benefits to children, why are certain organizations opposing measure 3? How does that phrase go? Oh yeah, “Follow the money.� The people who are showing acts of desperation are those who fear losing their jobs. In an email to his directors (on your taxpayer dime), one government employee wrote, “…’talk it up’ in your communities about the ‘terrible impact’ these measures can have…�
So my questions to the citizens of North Dakota are these: Who are you going to listen to, people who organize illegal coalitions and spread lies to keep their jobs, or children who’ve been through divorce, both with and without shared parenting? What are you going to believe, lies and rumors spread as fear tactics, or multiple reputable studies showing the benefits of shared parenting to children?
news, child support, shared parenting, equal custody, equal parenting, parenting, children, money, corruption, joint custody, parenting plans, collaborative divorce, child abuse, child maltreatment, child custody, family law reform , civil rights , new civil rights movement, domestic violence, divorce, election, fathers, fathers rights, mens rights, parents, mothers, family court, north dakota
Here are the Fathers4Justice and Men’s Shelter Custody Network members and supporters who rallied in Pennsylvania for the Death of the American Father.
I just came across this website, Fierro Family Law, with some very good information on Divorce in California. I’m not endorsing the law firm, just sharing the great information they offer. Here’s a list:
Men's Interests is an online magazine for men who love things, news, and all around media. We highlight the best articles, gadgets, DVDs, books, and much more. We bring you a mixture of ten products and articles every week. There is absolutely no need to thank us.
Feel free to email us tips, please visit the "Contact Me" page for further details.
Men’s Interests Author(s)
